The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010.
The illustration shows the change in the external and internal space of a museum between 1990 and 2010.
As can be seen from the maps, the most noticeable alteration in the area is the replacement of the garden in the east for the expansion of car park, whereas the western side has undergone changes including the extension of the shop and the substitution of the cottage for the new cafe.
In 1990, the eastern part of the museum was divided into two areas, including the parking lot and a garden. Moving to the west, there were several main rooms accessed by the entrance on the left side of the path. The four major establishments on this side were a store room, shop, exhibition room, and cottage at the far end, near the main road.
20 years later, there was an increase in the width of the western part of the museum, accordingly, the path and the eastern side were reduced in breadth. Specifically, the garden was cut down to provide space for the car park on the right side of the map. Regarding the west of the museum, while the entrance has experienced a reduction in size, the store room and shop were widened. Noticeably, the cottage which was located to the south of the museum was substituted by a cafe. During the whole period, the exhibition room, the main road, and the garden surrounding the museum were three places that remained the same.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference centre in 2010 and 2025 78
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extend do you agree 89
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- Topic Some people argue that we should do research into our family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations 56
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6106557377 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49596220552 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512295081967 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3348853941 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134099135417 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655878511292 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849464915353 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110372460801 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109993842847 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.