Some people think that people should be given right use of fresh water as they like. Others believe governments should control toughly over the use of fresh water. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
Lack of fresh water in some countries raises a controversial topic of whether people should be allowed to use clean water by their own way or governments should strictly control the amount of water use. I would argue that it is better to let people use fresh water by themselves.
The option to use clean water under the management of governments has some advantages. If each of us are forced to use 1 litre of water per day, we can just consume the quantity of water as assigned. This will result in less water being wasted. Everybody will have enough fresh water to serve their daily activities. Furthermore, controlling the amount of clean water use will create many storage sources to watch out for natural disasters, people will have clean water to use if the water purification plant is broken.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for residents to be free to use fresh water. Firstly, some daily activities ranging from taking showers, cooking, drinking to washing dishes will become more convenient. Without restriction on the volume of water used, people tend to open the faucet in a maximum way which will lead to some tasks related to water being done faster. Secondly, when people are enabled to have freedom to use clean water, it will be a solid foundation for many water parks to establish. These places provide a cooling entertainment solution for people when summer approaches. This model not only brings revenue for companies, but also contributes to the developments of the nation through tax.
In short, it seems to me that people need to be free to use clean water for their purpose to enhance the standard of living because water is an essential part of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-05 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | hyst12 | 89 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
- The charts show information about children learning musical instruments in 1996 and 2016 in the UK 91
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 67
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Lack of fresh water in some countries ra...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people use fresh water by themselves. The option to use clean water under the ...
^^^
Line 2, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., people will have clean water to use if the water purification plant is broken. ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he water purification plant is broken. On the other hand, I believe that it is ...
^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a maximum way" with adverb for "maximum"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...er used, people tend to open the faucet in a maximum way which will lead to some tasks related t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...velopments of the nation through tax. In short, it seems to me that people nee...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78644067797 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57228505182 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55593220339 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7221487485 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.857142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408937874134 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165951142396 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111831239483 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29399098992 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11511640015 0.056905535591 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.