Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Wealthy countries often provide financial assistance to help poor developing countries, but destituite situation is not improved. Therefore, the other types of solutions aid are needed to solve issue of poor nations and I completely accecp that richer nations should have other form of support.
Fistly, to get out of poverty in disadvantaged countries need to have truly support in the long term, it will be better to invest in education systerm of poor nations. For example, in recent time rich nations help inhabitants of poor nations approach with basic education. By way is deloy teachers, build more educational institution, provide more textbook and school supplies. This has result in significantly improvement in the general which make to the rate of young crime, illiterate are an decrease and people’s awareness is advance. That will help to citizens in poor countries ability read and write, have well- paid job and children can be able to go to school, improve standard of living and quality of life.
Seconly, rather than simply prodving money, richer countries can assist governments from poorer countries amout of technology, equipment and machinery. By providing and tranferring technology, specialisted machinery in the fields such as agriculture, industrial, or manufacture, etc. which the contribute to creating a motivation for economic development lead to the life of poor citizens have more income, food to ward off hunger and disease. Furthermore, weath countries can help to contruct road or infrastructures, it will reduce financial burden for goverments of poor contries and onvenient for travel of people.
In conclusion, while giving financial aid to poor countries can be beneficial in the short term, providing education and technology will give beneficial for them more in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-18 | cusonnui | 79 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | SharmisthaNaskar | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-02 | quytnee | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | AnhQuoc | 73 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the informat 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 492, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...the rate of young crime, illiterate are an decrease and people’s awareness is adva...
^^
Line 2, column 574, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...nce. That will help to citizens in poor countries ability read and write, have well- paid...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... industrial, or manufacture, etc. which the contribute to creating a motivation for economic d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41403508772 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99887328796 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1262958211 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.583333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319057008932 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10839170973 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890548324264 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203381881669 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491879645132 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.