The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided table sketches out the distribution of workers in terms of their genders as well as the number of factories in the aggregate in England and Wales throughout half a century, from 1851 to 1901.
What stands out in the chart is the fact that the gap between the quantity of each gender significantly went into free-fall. Besides, there are contrasting patterns among the amount of employees, which experienced a descending trend, and the number of factories, which otherwise witnessed a surge up, within years.
As the data suggests, the number of both male and female employees dropped over the years: from 287010 to 31000 as for the former and from 190000 to 30000 as for the latter. However, the male ones are observed to account for the majority of the community most of the years, while only in 1861, there were roughly 28000 women more than men. In fact, even though the male population was approximately 1,5 times larger than its counterpart, the two groups were mostly at the same size by the end of the period (at around 31000 and 30000 people for male and female respectively).
Observing a bigger picture, it is clear that the total employment of factories experienced a downward trend. To be specific, within the first 40 years, the number dropped by almost 4 times from 400000 to 105000 people. The figure then continued to decline by about 39000 by the end of the period. Meanwhile, the number of factories suddenly rose from 225 to 727 during the first 10 years and then fluctuated throughout the period until it finally reached 600.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | songuyen14 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Chen ni | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | buiminhduc | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | soomi2209 | view | |
| 2021-09-10 | soomi2209 | view |
- People nowadays sleep less than they used to in the past What do you think is the reason behind this What are the effects on individuals and people around them 78
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry 78
- the charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, if, then, well, while, as for, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82899628253 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5843517522 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 106.607317073 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583643122677 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3469524349 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.9 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142574281291 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541035110879 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702699783934 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976018768331 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847585077712 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.