The charts below show the proportions of the world's oil resources held in different areas, together with the proportions consumed annually in the same areas.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables representing data in percentage terms offer a breakdown of the oil reserves in different countries, along with their consumption ratios per annum.
Overall, more than half of the total oil resources is held by the Middle East, however, the biggest consumers are among those keeping the lowest levels of oil stock, namely Asia, United States and Western Europe.
As can be seen from the left graph, following the Middle East’s 56% share, Canada, Central and South America, Eastern Europe and Africa account for another 35% of the total stockpile, with the weights between 5% and 15% per country. Owning a relatively low amount of commodity resources, Asia, United States and Western Europe stand at 1% to 3% range. Lastly, we can see that Australia and New Zealand together with the Other group of countries are responsible for just below 1.5%.
Nevertheless, consumption distribution do not follow the same pattern and reveal that the main takers of oil are Asia, United States and Western Europe, whose weights averaging around 23%. These countries are followed by the Middle East, Central and South America and Eastern Europe, with the total utilisation of about 18%. Canada, Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Other states have roughly similar consumption percentage fluctuating from 1% to 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | fmichela | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-17 | abishek_dhakal | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-22 | vietpro4827 | 62 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | Valeriya | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-26 | greener | 62 | view |
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Do you agree 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world 76
- The pie charts below give information about the composition of household rubbish in the United Kingdom in two different years 78
- The given graphs illustrate a waste ratio within the family of UK in 1985 and 2002 84
- A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature novels plays and poems than they used to This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public for culture In general and for the futur 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25118483412 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55650195636 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630331753555 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9784623308 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10029355039 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433900129672 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349227652879 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661522426517 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195506745046 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.