The map below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now.
The map given illustrates the modernization of the layout of Riverage college over a period of 30 years.
It is evident from the map that the college has undergone some significant transformations, with the most typical one being the constructions of some amenities. Additionally, a Sport Hall has remained unchanged over time.
To the west of the college, there was a Sport Hall and a terrace, whose locations have not experienced any changes currently, accompanied by the conversion of the flower situated adjacent to the Hall into steps. Meanwhile, in the middle of the college, a library was flanked by a refectory to the north and a common room to the south 30 years ago. Up to now, there have been the substitutions of an office and a café for the refectory and the common room respectively, whereas the library still existed at the same position where it used to be.
In the eastern area, four offices located to the north of a reception has been demolised to make way for the erection of an art-class room. Likewise, the reception has unchanged, compared to the introduction of a music room to the south of it. In addition, a tree has been planted at the position where a car park used to be.
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries Why Effects on society 84
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to providing formal education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The pictures illustrate how the layout of a school library changed over five years 67
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, still, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70283018868 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94754711546 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533018867925 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9786475141 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139977219649 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535697034263 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702866483568 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930234518877 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774320773147 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.