The chart below shows the percentage of people born in and outside of Australia living in cities, towns, and rural areas in 1950 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the proportion of individuals born in and outside Australia deciding to shelter in three distinct areas in 1950 and 2010.
It is clear from the chart that during the research period, both Austrailia-born and foreign-born were prone to inhabit in metropolitan regions. In addition, there were declines witnessed in the figures for countryside areas in two categories.
About those born in Australia, in 1995, there were 50% of individuals residing in cities, whereas the figures for towns and rural regions accounted for 20% and 30% of the total in turn. Conversely, to 2010, the rate of city dwellers experienced gradual increase to 63%. At the same time, those of towns and unpopulated areas dropped to a comparable figure, to 18%.
In terms of foreign-born, in 1995, 60% of inhabitants settled down in cities, compared to 40% of them living in rural regions. Likewise, the percentage of towns was dwarfed by that of countryside, at 10%. In 2010, individuals tended to head to the urban areas, at 80%, followed by an instability saw in the share of towns. By contrast, there was a five-fold growth in the figure for unpopulated regions to 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Huyenlbg87 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | truong3011 | 84 | view |
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food clothing or medicine To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries Why Effects on society 84
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The map below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, likewise, well, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00512820513 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98779458837 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6926597266 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202838058614 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750091316832 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583675254516 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132688991949 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591648609154 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.