Some people think that business subjects should be mandatory in high school education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion that business education should be incorporated into the high school curriculum. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with this viewpoint given some particular benefits it brings to students.
To begin with, incorporating business subjects into the high school curriculum can provide students with practical knowledge that is applicable to various aspects of life. By learning about fundamental business concepts such as finance, marketing, and entrepreneurship, students can develop a solid foundation which enables them to navigate the complexities of the modern economy and make informed decisions regarding personal finance, investment and savings. In addition, business education could foster critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Students will learn to analyze complex situations, consider multiple perspectives, and make well-reasoned judgments. These skills equip them to effectively address challenges and make informed decisions, preparing them for the demands of the real world.
Furthermore, mandatory business subjects in high school education provide students with a broader understanding of the world and enhance their career prospects. In fact, business concepts are not confined to the business realm alone but have a cross-disciplinary nature that extends to various fields such as science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEM). Therefore, integrating business subjects into the curriculum allows students to gain interdisciplinary skills and a holistic perspective. They can explore the intersections between business principles and other subjects, fostering creativity and innovation. For instance, understanding marketing concepts can help students develop effective communication skills, which are valuable in any profession.
In brief, I firmly believe that business subjects should be mandatory in high school education due to their practicality and relevance in equipping students with essential skills for their future endeavours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | Dangdang | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | duchuynh | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-08 | lehonganh1212 | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-06 | Marywonderlaw | 78 | view |
- The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018 67
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 67
- In recent years the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing What kinds of changes can occur Do you think these changes are positive and negative 56
- The graph shows information about the number of people in Australia who use Chinese Arabic Italian and Greek as their first language 73
- The charts below show agricultural production in two different regions of the country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in brief, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.30656934307 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33359350397 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9710203232 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.923076923 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252805723936 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966035439375 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928294253358 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186769185505 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639465089217 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.32 12.4159519038 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in brief, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.30656934307 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33359350397 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9710203232 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.923076923 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252805723936 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966035439375 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928294253358 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186769185505 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639465089217 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.32 12.4159519038 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.