The plants show a student common room from five years ago and now.
The diagrams illustrate how a student prevalent room changed between 5 years ago and now.
It is clearly seen that there are major changes throughout the construction site with more furniture built to incorporate more facilities, especially in the east of the map.
In the past, there were four round tables that were alternately arranged and surrounded by small chairs. However, a table near the entrance was replaced with a long rectangular one, and the two tables in the east of the room were also removed to free up the space. A bookshelf in the southeast corner was replaced with a television and a set of three armchairs. Furthermore, a bench for laptops in the south and a new drinks machine near the refrigerator were constructed.
In contrast, from the West, we can see a cupboard, a sink, two benches, two microwaves, and a refrigerator, in successive order. These facilities almost remain unchanged, except for one bench was replaced by an additional microwave.
- The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now 84
- Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 73
- The diagram shows the process for labelling shellfish for the international market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 89
- Some young people look forward to a year of traveling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do u agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98773006135 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99448097858 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.669452384 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.625 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104451893085 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489505926933 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102126023191 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910109928529 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130206919565 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.