The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The plans depict the area of an airport on the spot and how it will become after being developed next year.
Overall, in comparison with the airport in the present, it will have more facilities. There will be more gates, and the walkways will be eliminated to sky trains. Moreover, car hire will be provided.
It can be seen from the first plan that, from the departures, ahead of visitors, the check-in area is on their left side. On the opposite side, there is a cafe for those who require beverages and food. After passing the check-in area, there is a passport-controlling security. Now, the airport has 8 gates, and citizens find their gates by walking along the walkways. After landed, visitors arrive at the passport control customs. Finally, people can exit the airport upon arrivals.
In the second map, it can be predicted that there will be more departures and arrivals. The cafe will be moved to the first left corner, where people can easily see after entering the departures. The check-in area will be on the right side while on the left side, which is where the check-in is located now, is the bag drop site. Even more, there will be a number of shops opened next to the security passport control. The walkways will be replaced by sky trains, and they will enlarge the airport by 18 gates, which are more than 10 gates now. Besides the passport control customs is another cafe, and next to the cafe is an ATM. The car hire service will be assisted, and it is sited in the right corner which is the nearest to the arrivals.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-09-08 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 70 | view |
2024-08-16 | ThHuong | 84 | view |
2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviours Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Surgery products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarises the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 7.0 329% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 1.00243902439 1596% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60507246377 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42417840449 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489130434783 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3742915424 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.7647058824 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05882352941 5.23603664747 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193048449749 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727073305524 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607154928559 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154178302918 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799543928179 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.