New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time.
Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantage?
Burgeoning technological innovations have significantly altered how minors exploit their time resources. I contend that this phenomenon is more likely to be disadvantageous since the adverse ramification on their health and relationship; however, it is also convenient for their study.
One of the prime drawbacks of this tendency is the negative effects on children’s health. With the rapid increase in viable artificial intelligence, humans, especially minors tend to be addicted to technological advances for their excitement and entertainment and less physically active. Which engender various physical health conditions such as obesity, eye diseases, or bone-related illnesses. Furthermore, it also triggers mild mental conditions related to anxiety and self-esteem or more extreme ones related to disassociation and depression.
In addition, this shortens children’s time for family or other relationships. although, generally, minors spend their free time with their parents, siblings, or peers, Children currently utilize their free time on video games and surfing the internet. This may lead to the fragile connections around them which diminish children’s confidence in their potential path.
However, technological innovations are a radical factor for children in their studies. The Internet is an ample knowledge source in which people can search for any information that they need so technological advances are a vehicle for accessing the immense familiarity. For instance, they can find extra documents on online sites or refer to Chat GPT’s answers for some abstract questions.
I argue that the obstacles of this phenomenon including the detrimental impact on both minors’ health and relationship conditions of them prevail over its aid for their study. I also feel that young people should be aware of either the hurdles or benefits of artificial intelligence to adjust their behavior and parents ought to control their children’s screen times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-01 | thaohienpt008 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-01 | thaohienpt008 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-07 | emilia234 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities for example helping at home or at work Others believe that outside of school children should be free to enjoy their lives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities for example helping at home or at work Others believe that outside of school children should be free to enjoy their lives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities for example helping at home or at work Others believe that outside of school children should be free to enjoy their lives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Today many young people spend too much of their free time at shopping malls This can be considered negative for young people and society generally To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some children spend hours every day on smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...time for family or other relationships. although, generally, minors spend their free tim...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79725085911 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20843705362 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6952011138 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228193240686 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08575212558 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677960291498 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13543129935 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834584838986 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.