It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to providing formal education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is always said that the sacred mission of educational establishments goes beyond the constraint of academic knowledge, extending into the domain of human behavior. In my opinion, this statement is reasonable because of the two primary features: the unique context of the schools and moral competence of preceptors.
Firstly, a variety of singular opportunities in which students can be taught to behave properly should be offered in the environment of schools. This is because there is a diverse of cross-section individuals mostly made up of fellow students and teachers, unlike the context of their homes, where the interactive circle is smaller and less varied. A primary school student, for instance, can be taught, observe and emulate different patterns of good behavior from teachers and friends, thereby being positively shaped into an honest and responsible citizen afterwards. Such behavioral modes might not be nurtured and developed at home which is confined by family members sharing similar beliefs and tendencies.
Finally, the schools are the best places to nurture well-behaved children thanks to educational ethics of teachers. Not only does specialized subject knowledge belong to the teachers, but they also own upstanding behavior, which can shape children’s impressionable behavioral patterns. Daily actions are the most common factors gradually influencing the students’ reverence, benevolence and modesty, which act as the core principles to success in the future. The class greetings, for example, is a good illustration for this point. The students are kindly greeted by any teacher upon his arrival at class, and he is respectfully greeted in return. Therefore, the teacher is a leading paradigm for the class about respect towards other people, inculcating such attitude to the children’s mind. Gradually, they would venerate everyone regardless of hierarchical positions.
In conclusion, the schools should be responsible for molding well-formed behavior for the students along with equipping them with textbook knowledge. By doing so, every student would be a good citizen who has both necessary virtue and capability for a country’s prosperity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | hien3112 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Annie Nguyen 07_09 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | grahamoneil | 78 | view |
- Most urgent issues can only be solved by international corporations Do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested about finding out the history of the house or the building the live in Why is this the case How can people research this 78
- The chart below shows the number of films produced by five countries in three years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- Online communication is becoming more popular than face to face communication Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Despite better living standard and advanced health care system humans still face lots of deaths due to dangerous diseases like cancer or corona virus What do you think are the causes and what measures could be taken to tackle the problem 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66363636364 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06896697773 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639393939394 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2901457818 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138458739184 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450986478747 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407954619125 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850594935059 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169063955272 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66363636364 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06896697773 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639393939394 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2901457818 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138458739184 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450986478747 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407954619125 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850594935059 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169063955272 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.