The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic raises controversial issue of whether questioning the authority is good for advancement and wellbeing of the society. Indisputably, it is believed that not interfering and letting the person in authority do his work can be most beneficial to the environment as well the society. Nevertheless, leaving all the power to an authority without any one to question can make the authoritative imperious. Such domineering person as a authority will surely lead to disorganized and a broken society. Thus, I agree that when people of the society start questioning its authoritative, the society’s well being is enhanced.
The term authority or authoritative means a person that’s reliable and trustworthy. When there is no one to check with the person in authority he gets blinded by the power. The improvement of society happens when people in it feel safe and are happy. Let’s take for example the government, the Prime minister of the country hold the biggest authoritative power. It’s people of the society who places the Prime minister at this position. Hence when the public isn’t satisfied with the government’s legislation it has all the right to question it. To illustrate let us look back in time, when India was ruled by the British Empire. We all know that the British rule in India was like an autocratic leadership. The people of India weren’t happy with the rule and it was people like Mahatma Gandhi, Sardar Vallabhbhai patel etc who questioned the doings of the government. The questioning, fights and raising voice done by various freedom fighters lead to the freedom of India. In this circumstance, it was obvious that someone had to raise up and question the authority for a free society.
In current trends of LGBTQ community are prevailing. For improvement of society where every single person is accepted for what they are, it was necessary for people to come together and raise questions against the law that were against homosexuality. Furthermore, authority dosent just restrict to the government and public of the country. There is authority in each sector. A simple example is employees and their managers. If employees start doing everything they are asked to without questioning there will be no professional growth of employee neither will there be a interactive work environment. Its necessary that employees are given chance to raise their doubts when some task is assigned to them. Doing so it helps the employee to understand the task as well accomplish it better. The overall environment of company enhances and resulting in company’s success.
Admittedly, the authority shouldn’t be pestered or interfered with every action done by them. Baggering a person who is proficient can lead the person to frustration hence affecting his actions and idea which are meant for the betterment of the environment/society. Also, its wise to not question authority when they are trying to bring in reform to society as it may seem vague at time but might have a great impact in shaping the future society. For instance, Abrahm Lincoln making slavery in constitutional was questioned by many but it didn’t make sense because such a reform was necessary. However, the above does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that not questioning authority can lead to any enhancement of society.
In conclusion, although not question and leaving entire power and execution in the hands of authority dosent seem bad but as long as some measurements are performed or some areas are involved its necessary the people of society question its authority to keep in check with them and enhance the overall society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | KruthiHK | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...g all the power to an authority without any one to question can make the authoritative ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 435, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e imperious. Such domineering person as a authority will surely lead to disorgani...
^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...person that’s reliable and trustworthy. When there is no one to check with the perso...
^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...es the Prime minister at this position. Hence when the public isn’t satisfied with th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 571, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rowth of employee neither will there be a interactive work environment. Its neces...
^
Line 4, column 783, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...derstand the task as well accomplish it better. The overall environment of company enh...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3064.0 2235.4752809 137% => OK
No of words: 595.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14957983193 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93888872473 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01189412987 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472268907563 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 959.4 704.065955056 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.2836440398 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8387096774 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1935483871 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03225806452 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235489852366 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610332701399 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481935963893 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145355184736 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200631386483 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.