In today's age of technological advancement, many consumers are having increasing preferences for hand-craft products instead of mass-manufactured goods.
Why is this the case?
Do you think this is a positive trend?
In times of technological advancements, many people are inclined towards handcrafts in lieu of purchasing productions churned out. From my perspective, this trend is mainly attributed to two main reasons, and I strongly hold the belief that this is a beneficial phenomenon.
To commence with, the trend of having preference for hand-made goods lies at the root of two main reasons. First of all, the influential impact of the internet gives rise to this trend. There is no denying the fact that nowadays, many hand-craft products from local villages such as conical hats, paintings and potteries, to name but a few are propagated pervasively and rampantly in cyberspace. This, in turn, makes handiwork hold sway over any other goods and become a frenzy craze for purchasers. Therefore, they just follow the hype and buy handiwork. Secondly, people seek after handicrafts on the grounds that they long to preserve the cultural values of so-called goods. Hand-made products are imbued with the heritage and traditional colors of each region, or village. Hence, if they were not to be protected by being bought more, the cultural identity may fall into oblivion, not to mention that this might induce an irreversible wave of cultural extinction. As a result, were people not to support hand-made goods, each region's originality may be in deep trouble.
Consequently, this phenomenon is beneficial as it does wonders for the environment. Without a doubt, making handicrafts does not involve massive energy and enormous resources as ther factory-made counterparts. Hence, the process of creating hand-made goods is totally environmentally-friendly.
In conclusion, I am strongly convinced that cyberspace and the desire to preserve tradition are the stepping stones for people's inclination to handicrafts, which is an advantageous phenomenon. Not only is it sustainable to the environment, but it also conserves the cultural values of local villages. Hence, people should buy more handicrafts, and simultaneously spread their aesthetic appeals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | An Hai Nguyen | 89 | view |
- In today s age of technological advancement many consumers are having increasing preferences for hand craft products instead of mass manufactured goods Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive trend 89
- Many people believe that the current system of both teachers and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree with this opinion 84
- Many different countries have most shops and products the same Some consider it a positive development whereas others consider it negative Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Some countries have an ever increasing proportion of the population who are aged 15 or younger What do you think are the current and future effects of this trend for those countries 73
- Some people say that what individuals protect the environment cannot make a difference Other people say that every individual should take responsibility for it Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1030, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
...le not to support hand-made goods, each regions originality may be in deep trouble. Co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47151898734 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26957853661 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617088607595 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.593601451 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.705882353 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200272172242 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598960708288 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525053027635 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109099714251 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644546699529 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1030, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
...le not to support hand-made goods, each regions originality may be in deep trouble. Co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47151898734 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26957853661 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617088607595 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.593601451 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.705882353 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200272172242 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598960708288 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525053027635 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109099714251 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644546699529 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.