More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people suggest that the solution to this problem is to increase the price of fattening foods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Obesity has become one of the most popular issues in mordern sociaty. The fact that overweight can lead to many serious health problems does not stop people from eating junk foods. Thus, some people believe that by increasing the price of fattening foods, we can solve this problem. However, from my point of view, this solution cannot solve the root of the issue.
Firstly, if we consider fattening foods as a kind of harmful product, we could add more tax on them, like what we are doing with cigarettes. However, the cost of unhealthy foods becomes cheaper and cheaper because of the high productive food industry, junk foods now are affordable for most people. In addition, we cannot deny the convenience fast food brings to us. Hence, increasing the price of unhealthy food just help increase income of manufacturer and governments, it cannot help people lose weight.
Secondly, there are two things people need to do to lose weight: keeping a balance diet and doing exercise. The price of junk food is irrelevant to these things. The only way can change people eating habit is by helping them understand the circumstances of being overweight. Once people acknowledge how serious their situations are, they will change themselves. Instead of adding tax, government can run more campaigns such as free checkup to citizens, making TV programs about the harmfulness of obesity, so that people will aware more about their health.
In conclusion, increasing the price of fattening food is not a good solution for overweight issue. People need to aware about their own health problem and change by themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-12 | sunflower1190 | 61 | view |
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- he diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people suggest that the solution to this problem is to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or not agree 56
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05243445693 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59207960623 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591760299625 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7849002838 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394691767713 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120285509821 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658668801487 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235553293774 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212084841104 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.