The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compare the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Looking at the chart, we can see that the number enquiries of in person and by telephone increase. But the number enquiries of by letter/mail decline.
In January to March, there were some changes in the line graph. Especially, the number enquiries of in person is ascending. Next, the number enquiries of by telephone had a slight decrease in February but it continued rising in March. But the number enquiries of by letter/email reduced a little in February but not reduced in March.
Starting in April, there were many vary in this line graph. The enquiries of in person sharp increased from April to June. It was follow by the enquiries of by telephone. It was at a stable level in April but continued sharp increase in May and June. And at last, it were the number enquiries of by letter/email. It was descending from March to June
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- There are too many challenges for international students studying overseas Therefore it would be better for them to study in their home country 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'followed'.
Suggestion: followed
...rp increased from April to June. It was follow by the enquiries of by telephone. It wa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70760233918 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70764654581 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46783625731 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2553127116 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.9230769231 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.1538461538 22.9334400587 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.38461538462 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235273577782 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915394619165 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140896567584 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207025701315 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.209613401077 0.0819641961636 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 13.2329268293 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.15 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'followed'.
Suggestion: followed
...rp increased from April to June. It was follow by the enquiries of by telephone. It wa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70760233918 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70764654581 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46783625731 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2553127116 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.9230769231 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.1538461538 22.9334400587 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.38461538462 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235273577782 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915394619165 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140896567584 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207025701315 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.209613401077 0.0819641961636 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 13.2329268293 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.15 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.