Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The prompt claims that we can usually learn much more from like-minded people than from those whose views contradict our own because disagreement can cause tension, demotivation and impede learning. The given claim is highly contentious because different people may have disparate positions or opinions on the topic. Some may go for the topic, while others cannot argue with it at all. I completely/partially agree with the given claim that we can usually learn much more from the people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own. The reasons and examples supporting my position are presented in the following paragraphs.
Learning from people who share the same views is much more effective and motivating than others who have different views this is because, with people who have the same views, we are very interested to discuss in many different scenarios; we can share different knowledge in the good environment because our school of thought is same. This can be convinced by my personal experience. When I was in higher secondary class, I had a friend whose way to think and opinions regarding different scenarios were similar to mine so it makes me discuss in more detail and we share very depth knowledge between us which led us to research that topic and gathered more knowledge. It cannot be denied that we cannot learn from people who have different views than us. However, we can learn much more from the people who share the same view, the evidence and example above support it.
Once, Ram mentioned in his biography that he learned so many skills from his friend who has similar thoughts to his. He mentioned that once in the library he met his friend from another section; Ram was reading the political books and at the same time another friend was also reading the political books. After leaving the library they discussed the topic they read in the library, and after sharing their learning they found the same views on the subject matter. Later they used to go to the library and read different books and share the learning and knowledge they read. He mentioned that due to the same views, they learn many theories and evidence about political change and history. Ram may indeed learn from other people who have a different view but the evidence and example show that he learned more with a friend who has the same views.
Many may argue that we can learn from people who have contradictory views of us. While it is true that we can learn from people who have contradictory views to us, we cannot learn much more than from people who have the same views because we can disagree with people who have different opinions and disagreement can cause demotivation, and tense and may impede learning.
To sum up, as per mentioned reasons and examples above, we can learn more from people who have the same school of thought and views.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-02 | kristen_vo | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | RIYA MODI | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Mateo Chen | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | okazaki11 | 62 | view |
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 58
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 66
- Evidence suggests that academic honor codes which call for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated are far more successful than are other methods at deterring cheat 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...e others cannot argue with it at all. I completely/partially agree with the given claim tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s, we are very interested to discuss in many different scenarios; we can share different knowl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: Much may; A good deal of may
... with a friend who has the same views. Many may argue that we can learn from people who...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, while, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 29.0 11.3162921348 256% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2383.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80443548387 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46831425869 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.383064516129 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.4956139094 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.421052632 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1052631579 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450580741188 0.243740707755 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177889660484 0.0831039109588 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169312938813 0.0758088955206 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306118208902 0.150359130593 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133854197145 0.0667264976115 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.