It is widely perceived that parents should be punished for their misbehaving kids. From my point of view, I partly agree with this view.
Firstly, making parents responsible for their children’s misdeeds acts as a deterrent for those who are negligent in allowing their children to commit a crime. A range of parents tend to be occupied with their work, thereby not taking care of their kids and putting an onus on raising them. Should parents not prevent their offspring from engaging in wilful misconduct, their kids will become naughty and uneducated. Moreover, children’s misbehavior is condoned by their family members, which would in turn recidivism and not comply with societal norms. As a result, parents will be reprimanded for not rectifying their children’s deviance. This would therefore lessen the burgeoning crime rate in the society.
However, children would inevitably take it for granted if parents took responsibility for their mistakes. Were families to be accountable for their child's criminal actions, their offspring would grow into insensible and apathetic. They would consider that the onus is on their parents to resolve their minor infractions. For that reason parents should not be held legally responsible for their children's misdemeanor, they could ask for the police officers to get involved and seek retribution for them. This would therefore learn from mistakes and change youth criminals into law-abiding citizens.
In sum, while I tend to agree that parents should not be punished for their misbehaving kids, I disagree that the vicarious liability of parents for being too lax in nurturing their children should not be enforced because the onus is on their offspring.
- The chart below show family expenditure in the UK between 1980 and 2010 56
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Do you think it is a positive or negative development Why 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'Should' requires the base form of the verb: 'parent'
Suggestion: parent
...putting an onus on raising them. Should parents not prevent their offspring from engagi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38518518519 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77995963694 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548148148148 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9755042036 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452852236912 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187460979557 0.084324248473 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11124789915 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324160906782 0.151304729494 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634544641738 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.