More and more people read e-books than paper books. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages !
The coincided developments of modern technology and human changeable demands created more and more hi-tech devices to adapt this pattern, making methods of doing some activities in all corners of our life be transformed. As a result, reading books is affected by this trend when the quantity of readers choosing digital books instead of traditional form increases day by day. Though plenty of inevitably adverse impacts are pointed out, e-books still are selected due to their outstanding benefits.
In terms of advocates, they claim that reading digital versions can give them opportunities to associate with a beneficial lifestyle when experiencing updated applications being simple, cheap and aiding natural habitats. It is straightforward to see that the electric version is more flexible than traditional copies owing to the fact of converting large real dimensions into data of smartphone applications, supporting utilizers to take a bookstore everywhere easily and be absorbed in book contents every time. Furthermore, users can purchase the titles with only one-click on this app even cheaper than the physical version, whereas qualification and origin of these are guaranteed by official publishers. The main cause of these benefits comes from rejecting papers out of the manufactured process, directing not only to save the money but also to reduce the adverse problems relating to manufacturing processes damaging the ecosystem.
On the other hand, opponents argue that human health and authors' rights are ruined by this trend. There is a diversity of evidence that proves that using the electronic devices for reading in the long term creates numerous detrimental effects on organs of utilizers, notably vision and complexion. These wounds are formed by the short wavelength emitted from the display screen, absorbed into biological tissues and increasing risks of becoming cancerous cells. Additionally, rapid widespread online publishing creates a conducive environment for plagiarism and selling without copyright, consequences of that seriously impact on legal benefits of publishers and writers.
In summary, adverse matters are only upgraded about the level of existing issues, while this tendency is approximately suitable for modern residents totally, especially in the young generation. Therefore, it may be concluded that advantages outweigh disadvantages of this trend.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-15 | Kha Linh | 73 | view |
2024-05-05 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
2023-12-24 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
2023-10-31 | kevann | 84 | view |
2023-10-12 | Mollymaul | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 733, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'benefits'' or 'benefit's'?
Suggestion: benefits'; benefit's
...ial publishers. The main cause of these benefits comes from rejecting papers out of the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, in summary, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69273743017 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01412568635 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667597765363 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4323512232 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.769230769 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5384615385 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209663226094 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579026894336 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599559540753 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10735298636 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784398111444 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.42 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 78.4519038076 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.