The prompt suggests that those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism casted upon them by others, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. I strongly agree with this claim and will elaborate on the necessary points to defend my stance.
Firstly, many people in history have failed dozens, if not hundreds of times before succeeding at something that will be forever remembered in history. Take for instance Albert Einstein, he had failed many times before he came up with his world famous scientific equation. He is a perfect example of someone who recieved doubt and criticism from his peers and continued to see his ideas through until he succeeded.
To expand on the point, aside from Albert Einstein, Malcom Luther King is another person who left a lasting legacy despite recieveing the doubts and critism from others. Because of his relentless dedication to see his idea of racial equality through, he succeeded and changed how African American people were treated in this country. His iconic 'I have a dream' speech will continue to be taught in the education system for centuries to come.
On the other hand, in contrast to my position, some ideas will not leave a lasting legacy and actually deserve the criticism or doubt that they recieve. For example, imagine if a person who had lost their eyes in war had a dream of becoming a judge for a mixed martial arts competition. It would be futile if this person didn't listen to anyone's doubts or criticism and continued to 'see' their idea through. However, if science and technology could give someone their vision back in the next few years or so, I would stand corrected. A study from Stanford in 2022 revealed that artifical eyes capable of restoring vision are in development could be within reach in the next decade.
In conclusion, it is paramount that dreams are not given up on and are seen through regardless of the negative feedback they may recieve from others.
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 50
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Instructions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the positio 65
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 50
- Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants powerful anti aging and immune system boosting compounds Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day the greater the benefits Green tea however contains moder 70
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tory. Take for instance Albert Einstein, he had failed many times before he came ...
^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...tion. It would be futile if this person didnt listen to anyones doubts or criticism a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 337.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84569732938 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48811950474 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551928783383 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.1217641471 60.3974514979 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.21951772744 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235006270983 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836164187954 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961214893321 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14223688051 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959608147702 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.