Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Countries with a high-based economy virtually donate money to the indigent ones, however, this movement does not solve the destitute. Therefore, other ways to eliminate poverty should be recommended rather than financial aid. In my perspective, I fervently advocate this sentiment owing to ration reasons.
Admittedly, burgeoned countries should help the impoverished one through improving their economy. It is manifested that when supplying the developing countries with financial aid, they don’t know how to utilize this amount of money efficiently resulting in not alleviating the poverty. Instead, the developed one should deliver some experts on various fields to these regions to eradicate poverty. This can be explained by the fact that these people have an immense amount of knowledge so that they can find out the problems and tackle them immediately. After being guided by the experts, the government gains a certain technology which can be leveraged for eliminating the destitute.
Furthermore, developed countries should facilitate the resident in the impoverished one to have more opportunities on labor export. This can be a mutually beneficial project. To be more accurate, the countries with the economic superiority can have an abundant workforce for continuously straightening up the economy. Meanwhile, people who live in poverty countries can get a lucrative job that they can accumulate for an immense amount of money before moving back to their mother country. They can make use of this money as an outlay for multiple purposes in their original countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | viet@2002 | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | quan12341234 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | cinderel | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery However some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities To what extent do you agree o 67
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 73
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52263374486 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99296085779 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5299391774 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.230769231 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21389174566 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835302078419 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729933804299 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16465045861 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385536517501 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52263374486 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99296085779 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5299391774 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.230769231 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21389174566 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835302078419 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729933804299 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16465045861 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385536517501 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.