Some people argue that governments should not pay money for international aid when there are some disadvantaged people in their own country, such as the homeless and the unemployed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In some developing and underdeveloped countries, homelessness and unemployment are still pervasive problems and unable to be resolved yet. Therefore, it is argued that governments in these countries should prioritize helping underprivileged people in their countries rather than allocating money to international support. I totally disagree with this statement since foreign support enhances solidarity among nations, and is frequently channeled to resolve international issues.
First and foremost, overseas aid should be encouraged as it could strengthen international unity. To be more specific, fiscal and practical support could not only assist nations in times of difficulty, but also highly value decency. Additionally, this goodwill gesture also fosters friendly relations among countries, which might in turn lead to commercial concessions in the long-term. To cite an example, financial and practical support from the Russian government for Vietnam in the Vietnam War have intensified the cross-border relationships, and turned them into strategic partners in terms of the global economy.
Another reason why governments should contribute to international aid is that they are displayed for global issues. More specifically, climate changes and Covid 19 pandemic, for example, are not the problems that some particular countries have to tackle, but the whole world. When member countries have to confront such an urgent situation, the international funds are deducted for them to address the emergency. In other words, paying for overseas support not only contributes to the community, but also provides governments succors when being damaged, which would reinforce their sustainability.
In conclusion, although there are statements that the national budget should not be channeled into global aid, I would maintain that they would intensify the bonds among countries and lead to commercial benefits as a result. Additionally, when contributing to the international fund, the nations will benefit from them, and vice versa.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | Lanlanlanlan | 67 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative trend 89
- In some countries people spend longer time at work Why does this happen Is it a positive or negative development 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Many elderly people are no longer looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86868686869 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17585709928 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4254595903 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.076923077 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264480466766 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895118610111 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068440444284 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155635966316 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912931027948 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.