Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend?
Nowadays, young couples have the tendency to delay having babies. This can be mainly attributed to their passion for work and the lack of financial resources, and in my opinion, it does more harm than good.
There are several causes leading to the increase in the average age of first-time parents. The primary reason is that people attach greater importance to career development. In fact, after having babies, parents could be occupied with child raising, which affects their work efficiency and makes them fail to get promoted . For example, some working mothers who will be on maternity leave find it difficult to get used to the working environment after several months and might lose their chances of promotion. Another reason is the lack of financial capability. Once they have children, parents will face the exorbitant expense of child rearing such as the money paid for babies' food, clothes and education. Therefore, some young married people choose to delay giving birth to children until they are financially viable.
From my viewpoint, the decision to postpone childbearing should be regarded as a negative trend, due largely to its threats to moms’ and babies’ well-being. Science has proven that a woman’s fertility declines as their age increases. Having kids too late may harm the mother’s health and can also shorten the child’s lifespan. In addition, the generation gap is liable to happen between elderly parents and their young kids. Since parents and children were born in quite distinct periods, the differences in their outlook on life become more obvious. Once the family members fail to harmonize these different notions, it may lead to conflicts within the family.
In conclusion, that people choose to put parenthood off can be attributed to the work interruption and financial burden appearing when having children. Due to its drawbacks of health risks to the mothers and the children and the generation gap, I would argue that it is a harmful development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | Lanlanlanlan | 89 | view |
- Many elderly people are no longer looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 84
- In some countries people spend longer time at work Why does this happen Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Many elderly people are no longer looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 73
- In some countries people spend longer time at work Why does this happen Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Many elderly people are no longer looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ency and makes them fail to get promoted . For example, some working mothers who w...
^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...maternity leave find it difficult to get used to the working environment after se...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21052631579 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6548287628 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600619195046 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0861138453 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215714599419 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061737502571 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434493812797 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126135417566 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232926094291 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.