Controversy exists when several people reckon choosing job-oriented courses is mandatory for an adolescent who enrolls in a university. From my perspective, I am not in favor of this opinion and I suppose that every student should have the freedom to choose his major.
There are various reasons why people believe that subjects that will be useful in the future should only be offered by educational institutions. Recently, with the increasing importance of science as well as the more materialistic lifestyle, technology has gained enormous popularity when not only does it help students get an all-round understanding of the world around them but it also opens brighter doors to future careers. IT staff, for example, can be on the average salary of 10-25 million VND per month, which is abundant for them to depend on for their livelihood. However, it is tragic that technology works merely create higher paying jobs and attract only highly educated individuals who are frequently from top universities. Therefore, with a view to establishing himself in the job market easily and getting a higher remuneration, an undergraduate needs to gain in-depth knowledge of scientific subjects. For that rationale, multiple parents force their offspring to bone up on these academic subjects.
Notwithstanding, this restriction may lead to society’s disequilibrium in the future. If people merely put their emphasis on science courses, other occupations may lose their potential workforce, which in turn has a detrimental bearing on the nation's economy. For instance, some countries have plentiful workforces in medicine and engineering, yet need to fork out extravagant money to hire workers for their smooth functioning. Studying the subjects, in which learners are interested, also leads them to more success as students taking part in the activities which they have been dreaming of serves as an incentive to work with a great zeal. Last but not least, the beneficial impacts of non-academics should not be overlooked when physical education classes will give pupils respite from stressful periods of mental activities in other lessons. This will boost their level of concentration and understanding when they get back to the classroom.
In conclusion, it is irrational to impose the subject restriction on learners whatever the circumstance may be. The youth has the eligibility to pursue the domain they long.
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 95
- Do you like to eat out or eat at home
- Some people say that traffic accidents are caused by the increasing number of motorbikes Others blame for man s fault Which point of view do you agree 89
- Some people believe that a gap year between school and university is a good idea while others disagree strongly Consider both sides of this debate and present your own opinion 89
- Studying the English language in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language Do you agree or disagree with this statement 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'staffs'?
Suggestion: staffs
...ns brighter doors to future careers. IT staff, for example, can be on the average sal...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...n turn has a detrimental bearing on the nations economy. For instance, some countries h...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41005291005 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09480053887 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616402116402 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3572496831 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8125 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241415194654 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704052023756 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074037367866 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129939535427 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469405895428 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.