The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
The table, as shown, compares the students’ attendance at four different types of secondary schools: Specialist, Grammer, Voluntary-Controlled, and Community Schools, throughoutthe period 2000-2009.
Overall, the proportion of students attending Specialist, Grammer, and Voluntary- Controlled Schools is decreasing throughout the entire period, while students’ attendance in Community Schools is increasing during this period.
Concerning the attendance of students in Specialist Schools in 2000, it was 12% before a slight decline of 1% in 2005, and it continued to decline, reaching 10% by 2009. Similarly, the pupils’ attendance in Grammer Schools started at 24% in 2000 before dipping by about 5% in 2005, and it reached 12% by 2009. In Voluntary-Controlled Schools, students’ attendance was about 52% in 2000 before a major drop in 2005 reaching 38%, and it continued to decrease reaching 20% by 2009.
The trend for pupils’ attendance in Community schools was totally different. Compared to other schools mentioned, the students’ attendance was on the rise throughout the entire period, which is from 2000 to 2009. Starting in 2000, students’ attendance was 12% before stepping up to 32% by 2005 and eventually by 2009, the students’ attendance had increasingly reached 58%.
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 54
- Recent figures show an increase in violent crime among youngsters under the age of 18 Some psychologists claim that the basic reason for this is that children these days are not getting the social and emotional learning they need from parents and teachers 89
- The graphs below provide information about the sales of three different types of music in England Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think intelligence can be measured in other ways What s your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table, as shown, compares the studen...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, similarly, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80829015544 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44472699318 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507772020725 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8680964459 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.125 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293357452126 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161917606502 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359309345637 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19543486095 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294238513418 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.4140731707 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.