The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
* the table show the percentage of students who were attending four different srcondary education systems at three different years.
Overall, and as we can recognize from the table, there was a stade increase in demond to join the community school, while there was a raghly decrease in demond for the othere three education systems.
Firsly, in 2000 there was a huge percentage of students who prefered to choose a voluntary-controlled school, by 52% of the total of students. On the othere hand the studens who liked to enroll in the specialist and community schools were the lesser in the schools types, by 12% of studens for each of them.
At the end of the period and by 2009 the community school demonstrated on the highst percentage of studens who pickied it by 58% of the students, however specialist school nearly stayed on the same level of demond by 10% of students, for the othere two types of schools, they had a dawnward demond untill they reached 12% of students for grammar school and 20% of students for voluntary-controlled school.
- Recent figures show an increase in violent crime among youngsters under the age of 18 Some psychologists claim that the basic reason for this is that children these days are not getting the social and emotional learning they need from parents and teachers 67
- Some people believe that using taxpayer funds to look for life on their planets is important Others however think that it s a waste of public money because there are much more important issues requiring funding on our own planet 56
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 78
- Should animals be used in testing new drugs and procedures Gives reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 61
- The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age of students who prefered to choose a voluntary-controlled school, by 52% of t...
^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...highst percentage of studens who pickied it by 58% of the students, however speci...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90502793296 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98475550625 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513966480447 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.363898899 43.030603864 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 175.6 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130614180891 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704845648832 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269288524394 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076276191902 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315384189107 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.