In many societies, foraging has been a leisure activity enjoyed by some individuals. Foraging involves searching and gathering wild food resources such as fruits, nuts, mushrooms, and edible plants. Proponents argue that foraging is not only a recreational pursuit but also a way to connect with nature and promote sustainability. However, critics argue that foraging can have negative impacts on the environment and may not be a suitable leisure activity for everyone.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Write at least 250 words.
In recent year, foraging becomes not only a leisure activity for people to find balances and to escape from daily exhausted life but also a way to reconnect with nature and wild life. In contrast, critics do not support that statement, and foragers are thought to affect seriously on the wild environment. I definitely agree with the first statements, and this essay will discuss both pros and cons of foraging.
On the one hand, foraging is claimed to have various positive effects. According to the UK’s research, foraging is significantly changing people life, and many people have successfully found a relax way to re-charge their flat moods during the Covid-19 pandemic, by just simply spending time walking through the forest and searching edible plants likes: nettles, berries, mushrooms, etc. In addition, since these foods are totally free, this activity also cut down the price for food monthly during the high inflation and lack of food period. Moreover, foragers argue that this type of food refers to "superfood", which contains high nutrition, vitamins and is fresh. Consequently, people stand on the other side have contrasted look at this activity.
On the other hand, these pack of activities (find out edible food, and gain it) are thought to be harmful for the environment. Critics argue that foraging is devastating the wild life and ecosystem. From my perspective, I don’t agree that too much people forage will make a negative impact; in fact, foraging might not rapidly develop in a short period of time that we will lose control. Firstly, in Vietnam and in other big Asia’s cities (such as Ho Chi Minh city, Hanoi, etc.) there are not many forests or places where are suitable for citizens to forage. In facts, when people want to forage, they must go to the countryside or botanical garden, which is too far away; for that reason, I agree that foraging just suitable for some people who are active, have time and right place. Imagine that you have only one or two day at the weekend to compensate for the loss energy after a whole long, hard-working week at your company, most people will spend that time to take a long sleep and laze around. But these people cause no damage to this activity.
In conclusion, foraging is a helpful activity for people who’d loved to balance their life, and surrounded by nature, I will always support this activity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-28 | annaalysia007 | 84 | view |
- Failure is a proof that the desire wasn t strong enough To what extent do you agree 61
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers Summarise the information by selec 73
- In many societies foraging has been a leisure activity enjoyed by some individuals Foraging involves searching and gathering wild food resources such as fruits nuts mushrooms and edible plants Proponents argue that foraging is not only a recreational purs 89
- Failure is a proof that the desire wasn t strong enough To what extent do you agree 73
- There is an increasing trend around the world of married couples deciding not to have children Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for couples who decide to do this 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...and many people have successfully found a relax way to re-charge their flat moods durin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ities find out edible food, and gain it are thought to be harmful for the environme...
^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... my perspective, I don’t agree that too much people forage will make a negative impa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ng might not rapidly develop in a short period of time that we will lose control. Firstly, in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95533498759 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63280462459 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570719602978 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9912980388 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.470588235 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218913306712 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748443176296 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554869809657 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139802889054 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295569184175 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.