In recent years, foraging becomes not only a leisure activity for people to find balances and to escape from daily exhausted life but also a way to reconnect with nature and wildlife. In contrast, critics do not support that statement, and foragers are thought to affect seriously on the wild environment. I definitely agree with the first statements. This essay will discuss both pros and cons of foraging, plus support the first point.
On the one hand, foraging is claimed to help people reconnect with savage nature and maintain balance. According to the UK’s research, scavenging is significantly changing people life, and many people have successfully found a de-stressed way to re-charge their flat moods during the Covid-19 pandemic, by just simply spending time walking through the forest and searching edible plants likes: nettles, berries, mushrooms, etc. In addition, since these foods are completely free, this activity also cut down the price for food monthly during the high inflation and lack of food period. Moreover, foragers argue that this type of food refers to "superfood", which contains high nutrition, vitamins and is fresh. Consequently, people stand on the other side have contrasting look at this activity.
Critics contend that foraging is devastating the wild life and ecosystem, but I disagree that too much people forage will make negative impacts; in fact, foraging might not rapidly develop in a short period of time that we will out of control. Firstly, in Hanoi and in other big Asia’s cities, there are not many forests or places suitable for citizens to scavenge. Indeed, when people want to forage, they must go to the countryside or botanical garden, which is too far away; for that reason, I think that foraging just suitable for some people who are active, have time and right place. Imagine that you only have one or two day at the weekend to compensate for the loss energy after a whole long, hard-working week at your company, most people will spend that time to take a long sleep and laze around. But these people cause no threat to this activity.
In conclusion, foraging is a helpful activity for people who’d loved to maintain stability life, and surrounded by nature. I will always support this activity.
- In many societies foraging has been a leisure activity enjoyed by some individuals Foraging involves searching and gathering wild food resources such as fruits nuts mushrooms and edible plants Proponents argue that foraging is not only a recreational purs 78
- Many children these days have an unhealthy lifestyle Both schools and parents are responsible for solving this problem To what extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge o 67
- Some people think that parents should teach their children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the best place to learn this Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Failure is a proof that the desire wasn t strong enough To what extent do you agree 61
- Failure is a proof that the desire wasn t strong enough To what extent do you agree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd many people have successfully found a de-stressed way to re-charge their flat ...
^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... and ecosystem, but I disagree that too much people forage will make negative impact...
^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ng might not rapidly develop in a short period of time that we will out of control. Firstly, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09625668449 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69504392286 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.805220543 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189680880853 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599332495918 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544601101731 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120432912775 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186093951152 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.