Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or Dvds. Do you agree or disagree?
Libraries are the lighthouse for all illumination seekers and the gateway to past, better present and future. It is undisputable to provide a rich variety of books in all public libraries for all readers sake, but the high-tech publishing resources on the other hand are questionable. The upcoming words will try to balance between whether the resources of public libraries should be totally spent on paper books, or some of it should go to the new facilitating technologies.
Technological advancements in the fields of publishing, such as electronic books and videotaped DVDs have invaded the reader’s world. Accessibility, facilitated by the internet, gave it domination over the vintage books to be in every reader’s, not only house or desk, but also pocket. But what about the public libraries? In my point of view, it needs some of these technologies to indulge readers to attend. Furthermore, it will make the life of the attendant easier in searching for information on the internet. Even an explanatory video on a CD or DVD provided by the library to explain a topic on a book is a mandatory clog in the wheel of education to whom who seek knowledge in public libraries. Some of these higher technologies are even cheaper than some printed books and do not cost much. Accordingly, whether the public libraries have a remarkably limited resource or not, it should provide some sort of new technologies in media.
For reader, the scent of a new book, or even an old heritage book provides some sort of euphoria and excitement for the new adventure that is about to be made. Without these books, we wouldn’t even have these high-tech media to begin with. As a result, there is no doubt that books are the pillars of the public libraries and should have the lion’s share of the library’s budget. Afterward, if the budget allows for more facilitating media equipment, then it’s a must to invest in.
In a nutshell, public libraries have a limited financial income that should be well spent. In my humble opinion, it is obligatory for the financial blueprint to provide part of technology in the library experience for a lot of purposes such as research and facilitation.
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 84
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 80
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 78
- It is common practice for some students to take a gap year after graduating high school to work and or travel What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readers'' or 'reader's'?
Suggestion: readers'; reader's
...f books in all public libraries for all readers sake, but the high-tech publishing reso...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...go to the new facilitating technologies. Technological advancements in the fields...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 943, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some sort of new technologies in media. For reader, the scent of a new book, or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...cilitating media equipment, then it’s a must to invest in. In a nutshell, public l...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quipment, then it’s a must to invest in. In a nutshell, public libraries have a l...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es such as research and facilitation.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, well, no doubt, sort of, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18157181572 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.43072275345 2.80592935109 158% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514905149051 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.1942547681 49.4020404114 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.571428571 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293034189513 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10125948758 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662654358646 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185943360656 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262132817189 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.