The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The average levels of participation in the education process and the highest education level of adults are shown in the charts below from 2000 till 2010.
In 2000, the average number of years spent at school, which ranges from 8 to 10 years is almost the same for both the adult males and the adult females, according to the graph, by the year 2010 the number of years for specifically men had risen by half, unlike the grown-ups’ women, it has not seen any drastically changes.
Turning to the highest education levels of adults, as we can all see in the pie chart, the university qualification level as well as the master qualification level went from one tenth to be slightly over the third of the percentage, in the case for primary school in 2000 it was one fourth of all levels and throughout the years it has decreased to be 2.1 percent.
Overall, it seems that there was a trend towards higher levels of education among adults during this period, particularly in terms of university-level qualifications. However, there may be some gender disparities in terms of access to education and opportunities for advancement, as the increase in education levels among men was more pronounced than among women.
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 56
- It is common practice for some students to take a gap year after graduating high school to work and or travel What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of this 89
- Some people think that enjoying the present is more important than planning for the future for both countries and individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree
- You are experiencing a financial problem and want to ask your landlord if you can pay the rent late Write a letter to your landlord In your letter explain Why you are writing to him Why you cannot pay the rent When willful pay the rent 56
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, third, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85096153846 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88704625139 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.6934830307 43.030603864 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 201.8 112.824112599 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.6 22.9334400587 181% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462598207913 0.215688989381 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.28434985363 0.103423049105 275% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.214904461731 0.0843802449381 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323355128208 0.15604864568 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222677582566 0.0819641961636 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.2329268293 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.74 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.