The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The pie chart discusses the percentage of the top education levels of grown-ups at the beginning of the 2000 century in Singapore.
Overall, knowing gender was the main to count the educative people over the period. In addition, the education phases qualifications between 2000 and 2010.
The determination of gender was very important to define the number of educated people between 2000 and 2010. Eventually, there was an increase in the number of spending school time, in both gender in the mentioned period, when adult males take around 8.5 years, on the other hand, adult females took just 8 years, while at the end of the period, adults males become near to 12 years, the adult females were up to 9.
Meanwhile, The topmost education qualification in the year 2000 was the high school with almost 35%, however, it fell in 2010 to be near 20%, never the less primary school was 26% in the begging, and in last it was 2.1%, which is in bottom out. highlighting, sadly, universities were just 8.3%, which is, by the way, an extremely low prestige, it rose in 2010 to almost 33%, happily, masters degrees were just 7.5% in the first year, and it climb to be over 30%, this is a real progress, furthermore, secondary school was 26%, it’s end with 15.2%.
- The graph provides information about the sales of three different types of music in England 73
- The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 89
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and so it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ning of the 2000 century in Singapore. Overall, knowing gender was the main to ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... qualifications between 2000 and 2010. The determination of gender was very imp...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years, the adult females were up to 9. Meanwhile, The topmost education qualifi...
^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Highlighting
...st it was 2.1%, which is in bottom out. highlighting, sadly, universities were just 8.3%, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., by the way, an extremely low prestige, it rose in 2010 to almost 33%, happily, ...
^^
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'climbs'?
Suggestion: climbs
...ere just 7.5% in the first year, and it climb to be over 30%, this is a real progress...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, while, in addition, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75454545455 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57452555205 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572727272727 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.9221623218 43.030603864 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 149.428571429 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183320503786 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103106997246 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665066659592 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130795801183 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057235383585 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.