The authors statement seems more of a sales pitch rather than an argument that is supported with examples ,relatable data or metrics to support his claim which is riffed with holes and assumptions.
Design is a very subjective topic and can change from individual to individual the author may find the design of prancer cars more aesthetically pleasing but it may not be the general truth. Even if the claims are true the more pleasing design to the eye may not be the best for practicality leading to the cars suffering from form over function. The aesthetic design could have major flaws like not clearly visible indicators, uncomfortable seats or driving position.
The 30km per gallon fuel economy boasted is not provided in comparison or as a relevant metric compared to the competitor. It could be possible that acer cars have higher economy and deliver real world fuel economy numbers that are very close to the claimed number where as prancer could not be delivering the number claimed in mundane driving conditions. This could also be the case if 2 very different cars with different engines is tested leading to range of values in real world fuel consumption of vehicles.
The performance of both cars cannot be predicted just based on the authors word of mouth that he test drove both brand of cars and found one more powerful metrics such as 0-100 kmph should be provided and even in gear acceleration time also help in predicting a cars performance. The acer cars negative review in the performance department may be due to its intended nature to save fuel rather than performance. This again comes down to what type of cars are being made by the 2 companies acer might be making daily commuter with more mileage and features leading to a lower performance as compared to prancers which may be making sports car.
What is considered affordable is based on the earning of the people and what is being offered is value for their money. Pacer cars being affordable as compared to acer cars is a baseless claim since we do not know the buyers of these products lets assume a rich guy wants a sports car with budget of 1,00,000 dollars he only finds prancer cars providing the offering where as a middle class employee wants a new car to drive to his office with budget of 10,000 will only be able to afford the cars made by acer.
Thus more details and further investigation regarding the claims made need to be presented to support the authors claims. In the current state they are weak and do not carry much weight to convince or provide a compelling case for the authors conclusion that "you buy a prancer car for superior performance at an affordable price.".
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 467 350
No. of Characters: 2182 1500
No. of Different Words: 238 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.649 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.672 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.512 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 143 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 33.357 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.792 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.339 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.679 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.135 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
The authors statement seems more of a sales pitch r...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...argument that is supported with examples ,relatable data or metrics to support his...
^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...at are very close to the claimed number where as prancer could not be delivering the num...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 368, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...nds prancer cars providing the offering where as a middle class employee wants a new car...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ble to afford the cars made by acer. Thus more details and further investigation ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ce or provide a compelling case for the authors conclusion that 'you buy a prancer...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 2260.96107784 99% => OK
No of words: 467.0 441.139720559 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78586723769 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59429242847 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 204.123752495 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505353319058 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 705.55239521 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.8473053892 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.490103438 57.8364921388 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.642857143 119.503703932 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3571428571 23.324526521 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.70786347227 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30114775648 0.218282227539 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108226379337 0.0743258471296 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632714255246 0.0701772020484 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152740877073 0.128457276422 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726634910315 0.0628817314937 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.3799401198 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.3550499002 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.1389221557 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.