More and more measures to improve the security in large urban areas have been introduced in many countries because of the increased crime. Do the benefits of these measure outweigh the drawbacks.
In the contemporary world, the proliferation of various crimes requires the proposal of governmental regulations to advance the security of citizens worldwide. Besides the insignificant disadvantages of several approaches, I am of the opinion that the benefits of these solutions deserve attention.
On the one hand, it is relevant that there exist distinct considerations of indigenous people behind some solutions that are being adopted in many regions. To exemplify, the time management regulations restrict pedestrian movement at night in order to minimize the proportion of kidnapping and sexual abuse. However, some assert that such measures curtailed their freedom to some extent and had detrimental influences on their mental health when limiting the amount of time they could spend outside. Furthermore, the increase in the police force in order to manage resident areas and the setting of CCTV in most streets lead to enhancing the sense of worry in individuals and invading their privacy.
Beyond the aforementioned considerations, the undeniable advantages of these measures exert potential impacts on curtailing the rate of crime in urban areas. First and foremost, the presence of police forces anywhere translates to their timely responses in some emergencies, resulting in fostering the survival rate of victims or preventing offenses. Integrating with the proliferation of CCTV facilitates seeking and wanted crimes due to this relevant evidence. Additionally, time management regulations allow individuals to reduce personal leisure and devote that time to meaningful conversations with family members, which are essential steps toward strengthening relationships.
To conclude, while enhancing security management may exacerbate the sense of inconvenience, I firmly maintain that these measures could mitigate the level of crimes to some extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | viviannguyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | TLan168 | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information about values of the exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 Unit NZ 73
- If a product is good or meets people s needs they will buy it Therefore advertising is unnecessary and no more than entertainment To what extent do you agree or disagree Agree or Disagree 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 73
- The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011 73
- More and more measures to improve the security in large urban areas have been introduced in many countries because of the increased crime Do the benefits of these measure outweigh the drawbacks 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84981684982 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24472247085 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608058608059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4157994316 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 145.181818182 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132522369852 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048910988675 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472949040863 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861521988308 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270237328404 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.