Some people say that in the modern world, getting old is entirely bad. Others, however, say that life for the elderly nowadays is much better than it was in the past. Discuss both these views and give your opinion
The question of whether the elderly’s life is substantially ameliorated compared to that in the past. While others argue that getting old is extremely terrible in the contemporary world, some people assert the better situations of the elderly are undeniable. From my perspective, there are reasons for this optimism.
On the one hand, there are several situations that have cast a dark shadow in people’s minds. First and foremost, the neglection of the government and their families leads to the lacking of confidence and independence. Most olders are retired and suffered multiple chronic diseases, such as diabetes or heart-related diseases. As a result, the sense of being useless and being a burden is exacerbated when curtailing the public’s consideration. Additionally, many authorities do not offer free health care insurance for the elderly, leading to the fact that they are unable to afford the enormous medication fees. The implication of this is that the public’s fear of getting old has become considerable.
Besides the previously mentioned statements, It is a well-known fact that the endeavor of governments to foster the elderly’s living standard and enhance the free health care service is worthy of recognition. To exemplify, a substantial proportion of national capital is allocated to welfare and fortifying nursing homes. Furthermore, the family members' and public’ attitudes hold paramount importance for mitigating the older’s sense of worry and psychological disorders. Some campaigns and broadcast programs facilitate this progress, resulting in ameliorating the physical and mental well-being of the elderly.
In conclusion, while some people concern about the drawbacks of getting old in the financial aspect and well-being, I strongly believe that positive measures could be implemented to tackle these issues such as pertinent governmental regulations in medication insurance and welfare.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | ktoan | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-05 | nida fatima | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | SATHISH KUMAR B | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | viviannguyen | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | HManh | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of female students on four different course at one university from 1970 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 84
- The best way to solve traffic and transportation problems is to encourage people to live in cities rather than suburbs or countryside What extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organisations 73
- The diagram below shows how drinking water is produced using a solar powered water pump and water filter Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 84
- More and more measures to improve the security in large urban areas have been introduced in many countries because of the increased crime Do the benefits of these measure outweigh the drawbacks 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether the elderly’s life is substantially ame...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns in medication insurance and welfare.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70934256055 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22013174459 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61937716263 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2078859388 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152292569634 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473041798457 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604913531878 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103157667839 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817772693972 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether the elderly’s life is substantially ame...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns in medication insurance and welfare.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70934256055 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22013174459 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61937716263 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2078859388 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152292569634 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473041798457 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604913531878 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103157667839 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817772693972 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.