Some people say that in the modern world, getting old is entirely bad. Others, however, say that life for the elderly nowadays is much better than it was in the past. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Due to the generation gap and rapid development of technology, the elderly become vulnerable objects in society. It is believed by some people that in the modern world, getting older is terrible. Meanwhile, the rest believe that these days, the aged have enjoyed far better lives than in the past. This essay will scrutinize both viewpoints before concluding that I am of the latter.
On the one hand, it is justifiable to opine that the aged in the past have better lives. The key rationale is that technology movements distract young generations from taking care of the aged who are assailable with offsprings’ behaviors. Therefore, they might easily face anxiety disorder or depression. Secondly, nowadays, there are many types of pollution such as air pollution, soil pollution, or water pollution which can cause adverse impacts on old people’s health. Meanwhile, in the past, the aged could enjoy organic fruit and fresh air.
On the other hand, the modern world benefits the aged in various ways. Firstly, these days, they can have better healthcare system and social welfare. Indeed, many chronic and incurable ailments are easily covered with the support of technology. Besides, many an old homeless person can gain a huge amount of money from the government which was invaluable in the past. Secondly, technology advances also deal with distance problems when the aged live far from their descendants. Since they just need a reliable internet connection and a smartphone, and this can ease their nostalgia about their children.
In conclusion, while I agree that in the past the aged were better behaved in some sectors of life, I side with people who concur that nowadays, the aged are much happier than in the past.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-08 | ktoan | 78 | view |
2023-10-05 | nida fatima | 67 | view |
2023-10-03 | SATHISH KUMAR B | 78 | view |
2023-08-18 | viviannguyen | 67 | view |
2023-08-11 | HManh | 61 | view |
- The given pie charts illustrate data about the percentages of expenditure of individuals on six different categories 11
- Some people think governments should spend money on sports facilities for training top athletes Others think it is more important to spend money on sports facilities for everybody 84
- the diagrams below show the water supply system in australia at the present and in the future 73
- the charts below show the Australian dollars in Australia s trade in 3 nations from 2004 to 2009 73
- The best way to reduce poverty in developing countries is by giving up to six years of free education so that they can at least read write and use numbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11578947368 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63027804103 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0597146844 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.125 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176285602306 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571835403816 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603212277676 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120127104894 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534293296188 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.