SOME PEOPLE CLAIM THAT NOT ENOUGH OF THE WASTE FROM HOMES IS RECYCLED. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
The significance of recycling which was always debatable has now become controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others disagree. However, a few numbers of individuals believe that the trash from households which is insufficient for recycling and governments should provide as a legal law to rise the process which is the main idea. In my opinion public should focus on recycle which is more logical. This essay will explain attributing to this trend along with examples in the looming paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays recycling is the most popular way to protect environment in the world. However, most of the people are unable to show interest about reuse of products from garbage because they think that it is illegal project in a nation. Moreover, authorities should encourage population for reusing materials through taking some initial steps. Firstly, executives influence to citizens by giving payments instead of recycled products. Secondly, providing a few benefits to give a chance for purchasing any consumers with reasonable prices which are also reusable. For instance, many recycled stores are available in Canada where people can sale used materials as well as can buy different sorts of households. Thus, it is clear that recycling is not only good way but it also more convenient for middle class people.
On the other hand, recycling can reduce pollution from nature for reason individuals should concern to collect garbage from recycled which can home keep the society neat and clean. However, governments should make a strict low for all to influence for collecting waste from house to keep fresh the environment.
To sum up, according to the arguments one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of recycling are instrument indeed. However, authorities should be taken essential steps for increasing recycled method.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant
- Some people think that it is beneficial for old people to learn new while others believe that once a person is past 65 years of age it is too late to learn What is your opinion 63
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor What are some of the reasons for poverty What can we do to help the poor 61
- some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out bout the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32214765101 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77781010847 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607382550336 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3311925975 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333484247243 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104644490616 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512444387611 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191708545734 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035599754896 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32214765101 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77781010847 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607382550336 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3311925975 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333484247243 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104644490616 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512444387611 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191708545734 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035599754896 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.