As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, some claim that business organizations should also have social obligations. While I acknowledge that making a profit is the top priority of any company in order to better survive in a competitive world, I still hold the thought that corporations should take a contribution to society within their sphere of influence.
On the one hand, it is rational that making business activities more and more lucrative is not only the fundamental element for the stable growth of companies but also brings certain benefits to society. First and foremost, having a financial abundance would support companies to avoid experiencing running out of capital, which can lead to some potential collapse such as bankruptcy, or taking on risky debts. Indeed, money is indispensable for an organization to cover operation costs, such as employees' wages and facility payments. In addition, in the context of competitive commercial activities nowadays, with the purpose of surpassing other rivals and holding a larger market share, a large budget is required to invest in long-term strategies, for instance, product innovations or marketing campaigns. Secondly, if there are more and more profitable businesses, then it definitely opens more career opportunities for people. As a result, life quality would be improved and the crime rate which has increased exponentially recently would be lessened.
Nevertheless, despite of aforementioned reasons, I would contend that because of the benefits of both society and the sustainable growth of businesses themselves, social duty should become one of the top priorities of companies. To commence with, those corporations that generate profit based on natural resources, such as mineral or fuel manufacturers, aside from exploiting the natural environment, are highly responsible for maintaining the ecosystem balance. In fact, overexploitation without any measure to restore the original habitat and process industrial waste absolutely impacts negatively on the Earth and human life. And of course, such irresponsible actions prevent companies from sustainable development objectives. The second thing worth elaborating on is that if companies are enthusiastic about community projects, and cooperate well with governments to establish charity funds or environmental protection programs, their brand awareness would be enhanced effectively. As a result, such firms would get very high credibility from people leading to an increase in sales. Moreover, they would be received government assistance, especially in the period that they are encountering various challenges and obstacles in the economic crisis.
In conclusion, scaling up businesses and making money is the main goal of companies. However, I am a proponent of making a dedication to citizens’ benefits would facilitate the sustainability of any company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 78
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 89
- Some people say that it is more important for employers to consider academic qualifications rather than personal life experience and values when hiring an employee Do you agree or disagree 78
- The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 84
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, of course, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72705882353 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24941602419 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607058823529 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 782.1 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1233286172 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.176470588 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2352941176 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136784513002 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452167681164 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628653730613 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981275057922 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417192269301 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 78.4519038076 195% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.