The chart shows the amount and quality of water supplied in two regions of the world
The chart illustrates the amount of water supplied for people and the level of water cleanliness in Australia and South East Asia between 1990 and 2010.
As can be seen from the chart, all the figures witnessed an upward trend except for the percentage of water clean in South East Asia recorded a downward pattern. Overall, the data for water users and the quality of water in Australia were highest, while that of South East Asia always have the lower number at the end of survey.
In particular, the statistic of Australian who used water in 1990 stood at 80%, then increased sharply to nearly 100% over 20 years of the period. Moreover, the total amount of Australia's clean water saw a similar trend but with a different pace. In 1990, the figure for water quality was about 70%, before going up of 15% in 2010.
Turning to the data for the water users in South East Asia was the lowest number, just about 35% in the first years, then rose double to 75% at the end of survey. After standing up at 40%, the figure for South East Asia's clean water ended up with 35%, which is the smallest number in all 20 years of period.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
- It will be better for both society and individuals is driverless cars cars can drive themselves become more widely used To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans
- the diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans
- The bar chart shows mobile usage in a country by age group from 1998 to 2000 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, then, while, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48792270531 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15177129889 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.743477521 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176943279264 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952077037699 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639673342612 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137359374109 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705534603408 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.