. In some countries, some criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch them. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The practice of televising criminal trials has been gaining interest over the last decades and has been applied widely worldwide. While this approach has some disadvantages, broadcasting criminal court cases will greatly promote laws and justice due to its transparency.
Firstly, broadcasting criminal trials on TV can have potentially adverse consequences in promoting justice and fairness. Public opinions lacking legal understanding can be targeted and manipulated by biased mass media whose only concerns are revenue and audience reach. This can lead the public to be misinformed about the significance of legal cases and the actual pictures of what happens inside the courtrooms. Secondly, this may present opportunities for the legal professionals in a trial to promote themselves for personal interests instead of focusing on prosecuting and defending. These deviations from justice and the influence of mass media’s priorities can potentially compromise the merits and virtue of law.
However, one of the chief advantages of showing court trials on TV is to provide transparency and deterrence. In some countries where the judicial system is corrupted and thus not trusted by the citizens, most legal proceedings are conducted behind closed doors. Therefore, it would be a practical step toward greater justice by televising court cases that the public can supervise. This could not only help reduce the probability of misconduct and unfair verdicts rendered by the judges and all parties involved in a court case but also provide educational values to those who lack legal knowledge, thereby helping the whole legal system gain trust and confidence among the people through transparency. In addition, public exposure to criminal trials can act as a deterrence to potential lawbreakers as they realize that they can be subject to public humiliation and stringent legal consequences if they have any ill intentions of breaking laws.
In conclusion, despite the potential drawbacks of televising criminal trials, the benefits of enhanced transparency, public education, and deterrence are significant. By providing a more transparent and concise summary of court proceedings, televised trials can foster a more profound understanding among citizens and discourage potential offenders overall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | chinh11111 | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-22 | hoangnunbg | 61 | view |
- In today s world private companies rather than the government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 95
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 78
- Different types of robots are being invented which are good friends to humankind and can help them with work and at home Is this a positive or negative development Vietnam 2021 04 24 89
- In some countries some criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch them Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Nowadays a lot of offices have open space designs instead of separate rooms Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71594202899 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09978825899 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585507246377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6288497453 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250695733808 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874775065717 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381550580698 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15593788743 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298246729681 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.