Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology. However, some think they do not have any benefit from this. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that the promotion of technology enables people to communicate with each other easier and more conveniently than in the past. However, there are some argument that they don’t have any profit from technological communication. I totally agree with this statement due to the following reasons such as generation gap and backwardness.
Firstly, the reason why I agree not all people can benefit from modern communication technology is that not all countries in the world can overtake with the global technological growth due to different reasons. Perhaps, financial status is the enormous problem preventing some countries from accessing to electronic devices which is used to make contact in daily life. Not only that, backwardness in some regions is also a drawback for individuals accessing to modern communication methods. A typical example for this is that some countries in Africa are still living in poverty or backwardness, specifically Senegal which is ranked one of the most destitute in the world so citizens in this region can’t catch up with universal technological trend or afford to buy for themselves fancy gadgets. As a result, they are not capable of deriving the benefit from modern communication technology.
Secondly, generation gap is also the reason why I agree with the aforementioned statement because youngsters are the new generation who have been allowed to use electronic devices since they were young so there is no obstacle for them to use technological stuffs to communicate. While the older is the previous generations who can’t catch up with younger counterparts. For instance, although my grandparents own brand new cellphones, they are always looking for someone who specializes in technology to show them tutorials of using or downloading applications
In conclusion, it is extremely crucial to make chance for all people in the world to approach modern communication methods and propagate its significance
- The table and pie chart gives information about the population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 67
- Some people think that governments should spend money on providing faster means of public transport Other people think there are more priorities for public transport e g costs environment safety Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 67
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...se technological stuffs to communicate. While the older is the previous generations w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 560, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...als of using or downloading applications In conclusion, it is extremely crucial t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n methods and propagate its significance
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41100323625 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19137501363 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546925566343 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.8461387098 49.4020404114 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0909090909 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4545454545 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270838552469 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116717573965 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888929783736 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156150456294 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900654101032 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.