The best way to reduce poverty in developing countries is by giving up to six years of free education, so that they can at least read, write and use numbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Education and wealth have a close link together. Therefore, many people opine that the most rational solution to reduce the number of the poor in developing nations is that the government pays all academic tuition in six years or offers free education, in order that individuals are able to read, write and use numbers at least. In this essay, I will shed light on some reasons why I totally disagree with this statement.
It is justifiable to believe that spending money to offer free education is an impossible way. The key rationale is that developing nations do not have much money. Therefore if they invest money into free education, they can face a lack of money and economic recession due to the fact that education is a long term investment and their government coffers cannot adopt the huge amount to remain the educational system. Moreover, people who just know how to read, write and use numbers tend to earn little money which is not worth the money invested. For
example, in Vietnam, residents graduating from primary schools tend to be blue
collar workers who earn 3 million per month while the tuition fee is 5 million per month. Therefore, the investment in this case is worthless.
There are other solutions which might have more effects. Firstly, the government can invest money into people who have a higher education since these people can be more competitive in the global market and gain more profit. Therefore, they can help the poor by building houses and schools, donating money and clothes. Secondly, the government can spend money on potential fields like technology. Due to the fact that, they can sell technological products to other countries and gain a huge number of profits, which can reduce domestic poverty.
In conclusion, I concur that the suggested way is not sustainable with developing countries by virtue of many an adverse impact and I believe there are some ways which are more reasonable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | too3ig | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | HManh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-16 | hieu13092006 | 71 | view |
- Some people believe that it is a good idea that older people continue to work if it is possible for them to do Do you agree or disagree 84
- water system in australia now and in the future 89
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- the charts below show the Australian dollars in Australia s trade in 3 nations from 2004 to 2009 73
- The given pie charts illustrate data about the percentages of expenditure of individuals on six different categories 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...eloping nations do not have much money. Therefore if they invest money into free educatio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s cannot adopt the huge amount to remain the educational system. Moreover, people...
^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich is not worth the money invested. For example, in Vietnam, residents graduatin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Example
...rth the money invested. For example, in Vietnam, residents graduating from ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing from primary schools tend to be blue collar workers who earn 3 million per mo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, at least, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00613496933 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60834337358 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549079754601 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5602973035 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244707217874 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733272431054 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649160778839 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102119497962 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834733635957 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.