The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010
The line graph compares four different areas regarding metric tonnes of carbon dioxide that a person released during a period of 35 years, commencing from 1975.
In general, there was an upward tendency in the amount of CO2 emitted in China, Thailand, and Vietnam, while the opposite was true to Singapore. In addition, Singapore predominated as the country has the highest level of CO2 during the period shown and Vietnam remained the lowest position over the same period.
Although sharing the same starting point at 0.5 in 1975, Vietnam stabilized over the first 20 years, then went up a little to approximately 2 in the final year, while Thailand experienced a considerable rise by 4 at the end of the period. Similarly, the level of carbon dioxide emissions in China commenced at around 1 in the initial year, followed by a significant growth to a high of 2 in 1995. Subsequently, this category saw a slight decrease in numbers before reclaiming its second range and reaching over 5 in 2010.
On the other hand, a more volatile pattern was observed in Singapore's carbon dioxide production. Beginning at 11 in 1975, which was much higher than the other three countries, the level of CO2 released by Singapore fluctuated dramatically and reached a peak at 15 in 1975. Thereafter, it plummeted by half in 2005 and bounced back to its starting point in the last year
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tones from four sectors between 1990 and 2007 84
- The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish in a city of Japa between 1980 and 2015 87
- The graph below shows the power generation capacity in Germany from 2008 to 2014 78
- Internet users as percentage of population 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, then, while, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85897435897 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80452930371 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606837606838 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2499158248 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1111111111 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169387293785 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662755950741 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693008231981 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108275233649 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767258554922 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.