The graph below gives information about the percentage of popultion in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line chart illustrates the proportion of Southeast Asian citizens in urban areas within a period from 1970 to 2020 and the projections until 2040, categorised in 4 different countries.
Overall, all population percentages have been experiencing un upward trend and are expected to remain unchanged in the future. It is also worth pointing out that most Malaysians are predicted to reside in major cities in the future.
To begin with, depite starting at the second-highest position initially, the percentage of Malaysian people dwelling in cities have witnessed a remarkable incline of over 40%, surpassing Philippines counterparts at the beginning of the 90s and becoming dominant in 2020. Moreover, it is reported that in 1970, the figure for Philioppines was slightly higher than that of Malaysia (about 32%). However, in the next two decades, this number climbed up dramatically to around 45% before flattening out in 2020, though there was a mild drop in 2010. By 2040, it is estimated that both percentages of Philippines and Malaysians residents in cities will have risen noticeably by just under 10%.
Turning to the other set of data, at the beginning of the period, Thailand and Indonesia population accounted for nearly 20% and 15% respectively. In the next 50 years, while the figure for Thailand increased noticeably to roughly 30%, that of Indonesia experience a drastic rise, reaching the second-highest figure at approximately 50%. In the future, both Thailand and Indonesia are anticipated to show a significant growth of roughly 10%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Being a celebrity such as famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits What are the problems of being famous Do you think being famous is good or bad 84
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 80
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- People should look after their health as a duty for a society rather than for personal benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some educationalists argue that non exam arts based subjects such as drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance To what extent do you agree or di 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29718875502 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06984442197 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614457831325 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6563459376 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.9 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141780143314 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521274181354 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385666250764 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080114384503 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428212605529 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.