The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart illustrates the quantity of households in the US by their annual income from 2007 to 2015.
Overall, the quantity of family income $100,000 or more lived in US was the highest figure in 2007 and 2015 except for the income of household in 2011. It is also worth pointing out that both number of US households income less than $25,000 to under $50,000 shared a similar numbers.
To begin with, at the begining of the period, the number of households income less than $25,000 was reported at about 25 million, which was lower than the figure of household income more $25,000 to $49,999 by 3 million. After that, both of these figures witnessed a minimally increased to nearly 30 million in 2015, respectively. Moreover, the quantity of family income more $100,000 was recorded at under 30 million in 2007. Then, this figure stood at peak of aroung 33 million at the end of the period although dropped slightly in 2011.
Turning to the other set of data, in first year, the number of households income $50,000 to around $74,999 was calculated at over 20 million and witnessed no changed at the end of the period. In addition, the quantity of family who had income between $75,000 and nearly $100,000 was reported at under 15 million in 2007 and remained the same after 9 years.
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The society would be benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, so, then, except for, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62555066079 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36116772872 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497797356828 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4364153465 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175563402721 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991053493217 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791632564863 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159423430533 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795158680753 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.