The bar chart illustrates the export values of a particular nation across five distinct categories during the years 2015 and 2016. Meanwhile, the table provides a comparison of the percentage changes in each export category between these two years.
Overall, the country's export landscape underwent significant changes, with Engineered goods emerging as the leading category, closely followed by Petroleum products. Conversely, Gems and Jewelry faced a notable decline in its export value.
In specific terms, Petroleum products, which stood as the highest earning category in 2015 at around $60 billion, experienced a modest 3% increase in export value by 2016. Remarkably, Engineered goods, generating roughly $58 billion in 2015, exhibited a substantial upsurge, reaching nearly $63 billion in 2016.
Agricultural products, constituting around $31 billion in 2015, showcased a steady growth of 0.81%, maintaining the upward trajectory of the country's export earnings. Textiles, while beginning at a lower value of $27 billion, underwent a remarkable transformation, recording an impressive 15.24% growth in export value, highlighting its newfound significance.
In contrast, Gems and Jewelry, initially contributing over $40 billion to the export earnings, witnessed a decline of 5.18% in its export value, resulting in a decreased contribution to the nation's total exports by the end of 2016.
In conclusion, the two-year period witnessed dynamic changes in the export landscape of the country, with Engineered goods and Petroleum products taking the lead. While most categories demonstrated growth, Gems and Jewelry experienced a significant reduction, emphasizing the fluctuating nature of export values.
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 78
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 78
- Research says more and more business training and business meetings are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In some countries, the average worker is obliged to retire at the age of 50, while in others people can work until they are 65 or 70. It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that fo 84
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 965.302439024 152% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88353413655 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15551243919 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582329317269 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5085586709 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.181818182 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364810151355 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144320781999 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08403419989 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193056528179 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109386783607 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 11.4140731707 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 40.7170731707 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.