The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040
The provided line chart illustrates the number of citizens in four particular Asian countries, including Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia. throughout a 50 year period from 1970 and the forecast of the 50 years following until 2040,
Overall, it is clear that while the Philippines and Thailand population witnessed a slight stability and predicted to rise after, the number of citizens in Malaysia and Indonesia sharply increased in those years surveyed and will continue to climb over the forecast next 50 years.
Analyzing the graph’s data, there is a similar trend among the urban population of Philippines and Thailand, while they started at different points, 30 percent and 10 percent respectively. For instance, there was a slight increase from 1970 and 1990 (Philippines population rose around 20 percent and Thailand one rose about 10 percent) and then remained stable between 1990 and 2020. After 30-year stability, both Philippines and Thailand citizen numbers are predicted to have risen and reached 55 percent and 50 percent until 2040.
On the other hand, the urban population of Indonesia and Malaysia experience a distinctly upward trend. Even until 1990, both of them accounted for a lower percentage of citizen numbers compared to Philippines and Thailand, with 40 percent for Malaysia and approximately 20 percent for Indonesia. Then, there is a sharp rise in the urban percentage of Indonesia and Malaysia surpassing the other two countries in 2000, which is predicted to continually increase to reach the point of nearly triple of the start points in Indonesia and Malaysia, 60 percent and 80 percent respectively in 2040.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- the chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 78
- it is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvatages 61
- Some people say that drug companies have a responsibility to spend money on researching medicines that will help people in poorer countries Others say the main responsibility of drug companies is to make money Discuss both these views and give your own op 11
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think the government should establish free libraries in each town Others believe that it is a waste of money since people can access the Internet to obtain information Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Throughout
...ines, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia. throughout a 50 year period from 1970 and the fore...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st of the 50 years following until 2040, Overall, it is clear that while the Phil...
^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...970 and 1990 Philippines population rose around 20 percent and Thailand one rose ...
^^
Line 4, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ban percentage of Indonesia and Malaysia surpassing the other two countries in 20...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 6.8 309% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33969465649 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86992699808 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522900763359 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 283.868780488 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.3520453601 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.875 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.75 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168982495411 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076769702704 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319533780738 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099923188979 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325310814615 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.2329268293 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.