Lack of fresh water is becoming a global issue of increasing importance.
What problems does this shortage cause?
What measures could be taken to overcome these problems?
Water is considered to be the most primary and fundamental resource on the Earth's surface. Since the past decade, freshwater reserves have been depleted by a significant number due to industrialization and urbanization and it is seen as a major concern worldwide. This essay will focus on the effects of this shortage and the measures to be taken to reduce and overcome these problems.
Firstly, lack of freshwater would lead to conditions like drought and detrimental effects on the survival of living beings. Every living being on Earth, may it be humans or flora and fauna, require freshwater for drinking. Rivers and lakes are being polluted and the once drinkable freshwater is no longer even usable. For instance, industries that are set up on the banks of river Ganga in India, use the water and discharge the wastewater generated without treating it into the river. Furthermore, cities located on the banks of rivers direct the sewage pipes into the rivers. Secondly, industries ironically depend on the same freshwater resource that they are polluting. Depletion in freshwater would, thus, also result in manufacturing processes being hampered. For instance, cloth manufacturing industries are known to use one of the most amount of water and generate equivalent amounts of wastewater to be dumped in freshwater resources.
If the situation continues, in a few years there would be no freshwater resources and life on Earth would cease to exist. One of the measures that can be taken to solve these problems, is that the government should impose strict rules and regulations on the discharge of wastewater from the sewers as well as from the industries. Industries that do not follow the norms, should be penalized severely with high taxes. Moreover, measures should be taken to create awareness among the citizens to avoid throwing garbage in the rivers. The government should partner with Non-profit organizations and raise funds for the cleanliness and maintenance of lakes and rivers.
In conclusion, freshwater resources have a significant impact on the lives of society as well as other living beings. In order to make the Earth habitable, these resources must be used cautiously and meticulously which can be done by imposing strict rules and by creating awareness among citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | neverlandforestcat | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Saket Choudhary | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Saket Choudhary | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-23 | vishal sachdeva | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-29 | d_kumar | 84 | view |
- Lack of fresh water is becoming a global issue of increasing importance What problems does this shortage cause What measures could be taken to overcome these problems 73
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 68
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- Marco polo 73
- Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company For the first time in ten years a company that has developed satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with the current sa 68
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22162162162 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93312857598 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521621621622 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6184868645 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135206321167 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469750585809 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585957147677 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951120679615 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500026891942 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22162162162 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93312857598 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521621621622 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6184868645 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135206321167 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469750585809 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585957147677 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951120679615 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500026891942 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.