Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion
In modern society, the uptick of technology plays an essential role in improving all parts of the world. It is suggested that becoming more social in public stems from smart items. From my perspective, that belief resembles two sides of the coin leading people to two separate ways, which are illustrated by this essay.
Initially, due to modernization, a series of smart inventions were made to support the variety of life parts; meanwhile, social media comprising Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest are more prevalent day by day. By that platform, in spite of writing letters and wasting much time to send them, people just type on the screen, enter the message, and take the figure in a few seconds. In the past, the distance between people became the barrier deterring them from communicating; however, nowadays, people get into new relationships with new friends around the world via the Internet. Introverted people, who have issues with meeting and making friends, can be done by technology. In lieu of face-to-face with strangers, they steadily approach friends in their own way and have time to prepare before dating in the real world. As a result, cyberspace can be recognized as an effective tool for connecting pupils around the world together.
On the other hand, the Addiction Internet phenomenon leads to a lack of communication skills and they isolate themself. The more online friends they have, the fewer real friends they remain, which is the main reason for their lonely feelings in people. In addition, there are many evil purposes for strangers tending to groups of online people in the making of friends. Teenagers without careful guidance from parents before using social media can get into bad company.
In a nutshell, Although social media is one of the effective ways to have new friends, the balance between online and offline friends is more vital. If people know how to use social media in the right way, there will be many profits.
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 11
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'group'.
Suggestion: group
... evil purposes for strangers tending to groups of online people in the making of frien...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... right way, there will be many profits.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while, in addition, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03680981595 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63526748636 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592024539877 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3469541018 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139951376297 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445240747035 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269696492371 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086123446827 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232626006334 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.