The only way to improve safety in our roads is to give stricter punishments to driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, road safety has become a global issue around the world. Therefore, punishing road offenders with stricter penalties is believed to be the only measure to enhance safety on roads. I totally disagree with this view as this way can be one of the numerous solutions to the problem concerned.
To begin with, there are several valid reasons why harder punishments can solve road issues. If the law in a particular country says to make the existing punishments tougher to improve the safety on roads, this can discourage drivers to offend. Higher penalty fees, for example, can be a burden for some people on a budget, or even imprisonment can also lower some reputable people’s status among others. However, this is not the only solution to make road safety better.
There are other alternatives in which safety can be advanced. Firstly, driving lessons should be enhanced. They should include better explanations of road infrastructures, the consequences of breaking the law, more practice with professional tutors, and much stricter tests in the end. This type of lessons, in turn, can help possible drivers not to offend on roads, improving safety. Another way is to increase the minimum age of having a license and driving. This is because young drivers are usually emotionally unstable, and they can drive recklessly, causing road offences as a result. For instance, in the USA, 16-year-old people can drive, thus recording around 36 000 road accidents each year. When this measure is introduced, roads can be secure to some extent.
To conclude, although imposing stricter sentences to lawbreakers can make roads safer, it is not the only way to do so. Other alternatives, such as a better training before having a license, and increasing the age of driving, are also ways of solving this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | ESSEYWRITER | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | ESSEYWRITER | 73 | view |
- Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public 84
- Traditional ideas from older people about the way to live and behave are not helpful to young people and their futures To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available Do the disadvantages of this outweigh the advantages 74
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an agi 84
- The Internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the Internet and what solutions can you suggest 92
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'say'?
Suggestion: say
...ues. If the law in a particular country says to make the existing punishments toughe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75707373053 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4101923458 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7058823529 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221020255434 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799723740434 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526217284295 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150983931006 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275363759513 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'say'?
Suggestion: say
...ues. If the law in a particular country says to make the existing punishments toughe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75707373053 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4101923458 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7058823529 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221020255434 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799723740434 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526217284295 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150983931006 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275363759513 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.