We can derive knowledge from the news, but some people think we can't trust journalists. What do you think? What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have?
Give a reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
There's a controversial concept that's heating up a debate that journalists can't trust. This problem occurs due to a number of reasons and it can cause a number of adverse effects on public perception and media credibility.
Several reasons may explain why some people think journalists are untrustworthy. First, biased reporting can undermine trust in journalists because it harms objectivity. For example, when journalists advocate a particular political ideology or agenda, their reporting can be skewed, leading to a lack of confidence in its ability to deliver unbiased news. Besides, sensationalism and clickbait headlines, driven by a desire to rank or readers higher, can also erode trust because they prioritize attracting attention over accurate reporting. A good example is when news outlets prioritize sensational stories over less interesting but more relevant and important news.
Nevertheless, instances of journalistic misconduct can continue to cause distrust. Cases of plagiarism, fabrication or unethical behavior that damage the reputation of the entire profession. The main drawback of this trend is that it undermines the credibility of the news industry, making it difficult for the public to distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources. Another downside of the problem is that misinformation and fake news can easily spread, causing confusion and social division. This issue can bring serious implications to public perception and media credibility.
In short, the notion that journalists cannot be trusted is attributed to a number of factors, including biased reporting and instances of misconduct. It is essential for journalists to strive for objectivity, adhere to ethical norms and regain public trust through responsible and accurate reporting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2018-09-05 | Trung Nguyen 1996 | 81 | view |
| 2018-08-05 | Vo Thuong | 91 | view |
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 87
- The charts below show the percentages of the water used in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 73
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 81
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the internet Do you agree or disagree 87
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
Theres a controversial concept thats heating u...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
Theres a controversial concept thats heating up a debate that journalists ca...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ts heating up a debate that journalists cant trust. This problem occurs due to a num...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76893939394 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19739827301 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609848484848 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2687195756 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210395691547 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725485903418 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449653195687 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118375246747 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446328467372 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.